I don’t expect a whole lot from my local newspaper, I’ve pretty much gotten used to their bias when it comes to political reporting. But the story that appeared on the front page Sunday, below the fold, was especially egregious. It is not an opinion piece, it’s an article that unsuspecting readers would believe isn’t tainted by bias. The reporter, Mark Weiner, obviously has it in for Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle. While the headline is somewhat innocuous, the first few paragraphs pretty much set the agenda. [Emphasis mine.]
When four days and nights of debate finally ended in the early morning hours Saturday and it was time to vote, U.S. Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle had no trouble making up her mind.
Buerkle had to choose between protecting Central New York from some of the deepest federal spending cuts in years, or supporting a Republican plan to slash $61 billion from the federal government’s budget through Sept. 30.
In an early test of her campaign promises to shrink government while also creating jobs in Central New York, Buerkle said the clear answer was to support the massive budget cuts – even if it means some short-term local suffering.
Oh, the suffering! What about the suffering our children and grandchildren will be subjected to thanks to Washington’s reckless spending for the past few years? There was no mention of how President Obama increased spending to unprecendented levels during his short tenure in the White House. Gee whiz, how on earth did we ever survive before he came along?
The article goes on to cite Democrats as if their word is gospel. Several paragraphs were devoted to the end of the “Just Say Yes” education program in Syracuse. Unless you continued reading, you wouldn’t know that the program has not been cut.
Matt Canter, Gillibrand’s spokesman, said the Say Yes grant was not specifically eliminated in a line item in the Republican spending plan. But he added, “The slash and burn proposal they put forward puts all programmatic funding into jeopardy.”
Okay then, why were seven paragraphs devoted to Buerkle wanting to end funding for “Just Say Yes” when it’s a total non-issue? Oh yeah, I forgot, they want people to believe that the children won’t be educated with Ann Marie Buerkle holding office.
The article also talked about the votes of Reps. Bill Owens and Richard Hanna. Owens is a Democrat who’s against any spending cuts. Hanna, another freshman, is a Republican who voted for the spending cuts, but cynically tried to cover his butt by saying he didn’t think they’d pass the Senate. That’s some way to stand up for principles, but hey, I’m sure he scored a point or two with the local rag.
Here’s the funniest, or at least the most ironic part of the hit piece on Ms. Buerkle, who said spending must be cut to get the economy on a more sound footing.
House Democratic leaders disagreed, and cited an independent study that found the spending cuts approved Saturday would likely result in the loss of 800,000 jobs across the nation.
Isn’t that interesting? It’s the exact same number of jobs the CBO director testified would be eliminated once ObamaCare is implemented. I could be wrong, but I certainly don’t recall Mark Weiner or the Post Standard covering that story.
In contrast, the Auburn Pub published Rep. Buerkle’s statement on her vote, without a whole lot of commentary accusing her of causing her constituents to suffer.
“I am proud of the work this Congress has done in passing the Continuing Resolution. Congress came together in an open and transparent effort to cut spending, save American taxpayers money in order to grow the economy and to set the climate for job growth. We are shrinking Washington to grow Central New York. No doubt about it, we are saving money for the American taxpayer.
The Continuing Resolution begins to shrink the federal government so that American families and business will not need to shrink their budgets any further to pay for excessive government spending. It is no coincidence that federal spending, federal debt, federal regulatory costs and unemployment reached record highs at the same time. By passing a leaner Continuing Resolution, we took the first step in cutting spending to create jobs.”
Note to Mark Weiner and the Post Standard: We’re broke! What part of that don’t you understand? Are you hoping we turn into Greece so you have a big story to cover? I’m beginning to wonder.
Update: The Other McCain linked – thanks!
Update 2: Da TechGuy linked – thanks!
I think the whole rhythm of the filmmaking and the dialogue is different than what it would have been. It flows in a more emotional and staccato way. It’s interwoven and interlaced with a level of humor and emotional intensity that are based on the realism of the characters. Also the movie within a movie, the HBO documentary about Dicky, the Christian Bale character, is real and I seized upon that as a filmmaker and wanted to use that as a device in the film. Not only dramatically as a defining moment, which Scott Silver had focused on, but I wanted to also use it as a framing device throughout the film, that there was this documentary crew around and you could do interviews with the characters. So we did interviews with Mark and Christian as the characters on the fly and we did interviews with the sisters. We did interviews with local people who used to be mayor and town manager and real people about Dicky and Micky and their impact on the city, and that all got used in the movie as part of the story.
Music was also something that I really focused on, the style of music that these guys would listen to and the kind of soundtrack that would really propel through their story and that resulted in some of the great music that’s in the movie that I think is married well to the dramatic turns.
We actually had the opportunity to ask some of our listeners what questions they might have for you and Ben here asks, “I’d like to hear about the choice to use the song ‘Here Again I Go On My Own’. Was the scene where the two brothers sing along while walking to the ring based on reality or was it just the most incredible filmmaking choice of 2010? And if it was invented, who invented it? The power of that moment where these two guys find solidarity in this song before the big moment, combined with the fact that it is a song more associated with hair metal silliness more than emotion, made it probably my favorite scene of the year and I’d like to hear David O. Russell talk about it. Any thoughts about that particular choice?
That song, the Whitesnake song, was one Micky actually used as his entrance song for many of his fights. I always want to look for the most emotional and poignant thing, such as the moment when Alice sings in the car with Dicky and they sing that Bee Gees song, which to me that was a very powerful way to show their special bond. In this case, to show the bond between the two brothers, I thought it was very affecting to see them in the tunnel, to see their emotional bond before they went out to this big event and for Dicky to be singing the song with Micky and for them to be singing it together, so that was an idea I brought to the film.
You mention that song with Christian Bale and Melissa Leo. “Jag” asks about incest relationships in your films, [one being] Spanking the Monkey obviously. But also according to “Jag”, I don’t know if this is correct, that you have said before that Melissa Leo and Christian Bale’s relationship feels in some ways incestuous, especially in the scene where Bale is singing to her in the car. Can you comment on that or is that way off base?
No, that’s absolutely true. When I was first looking at the story, I immediately said there’s an incestuous relationship thing going on here and when I was selling myself as a director, I said I want to make more of the emotion of the relationship. This movie’s in my wheelhouse because I totally get those kind of family relationships having done Spanking the Monkey and Flirting With Disaster and I really think that sort of odd bond between Alice and Dicky should really be felt emotionally and almost romantically. When you look at their family albums, Alice, god bless her after having had nine kids, is still a beautiful woman who could look like she was as much her son’s girlfriend as much as she was his mom so that is true.
I promise this will be the last time I mention Darren Aronofsky’s name during this interview –
You can mention him as many times as you want because I was happy that Darren’s credit showed up on the film right before we went to final print. I said, “What that all about?” and they said he had the right to put his name on the film contractually and he saw the film and loved it and he wants his name on it so I take it as a compliment.
Right, because you mentioned in the EW interview that you were taken aback when he called to tell you about wanting to getting executive producer credit and I kind of wanted you to elaborate on that if you could.
Oh no he didn’t call me, I saw the credit on the final cut of the film and I said “What?” And yeah, I was taken aback. But then he was very sweet about it when I did see him. He embraced me and told me how much he loved the film and I’d heard he wanted his name on there because he loved the film and I think that’s a great compliment coming from a great filmmaker.
It’s been a number of years since your last film and we’ve heard about a bunch of projects that you’ve been attached to, for example Grackle with Matthew McConaughey and Nailed as well. For some reason these projects haven’t gone very smoothly. I’m wondering if you could talk a little about these projects and are there any sort of common factors that you can identify that cause problems, do you feel like you choose tricky projects or tricky ways of financing them?
Well, we need to be specific about what’s what because people, especially in the age of the Internet, just start chucking ideas around which are not based in fact and they pretty much just get picked up as fact. They’re all different. I wrote a couple of things after Huckabees that didn’t get made and that was my own responsibility because I decided not to make them. I was going through a period where I wasn’t feeling the material and a harder period for me as a filmmaker. It also resulted in me becoming a better filmmaker and a better writer and a more instinctive one. But there was a period there where I was questioning everything and Huckabees wasn’t entirely what I wanted it to be and I was going through a divorce so I can take responsibility for that.
Nailed was a project that any of the troubles with that had nothing to do with me. Those was about the company was financing it, and this was during the Madoff era, was inconsistent. I had never seen anything like it. Our financing got turned on and off like a faucet and we were shut down nine times during the production, having nothing to do with me, just having to do with the nature of the financing company. After that went on enough times I had to move on with my life, I have a family to support and I had to move on and write other things and make other films, you know? I spent almost two years trying to get that finished and I just said ok, I got to move on.
The Grackle was a picture that was written by the guys who wrote Bad Santa, [John] Requa and [Glenn] Ficarra, really funny, smart writers. They were the guys who also made I Love You Phillip Morris, great directors too. I thought that could be really funny. I was talking about making that and getting them to do a draft when my dear friend Mark Wahlberg came to me with The Fighter. So as much as I thought that was really a funny project, if I have to pick between someone who’s a little like a brother to me and that other project I’m going to have to go with The Fighter.
Those guys wrote me, Requa and Ficarra, and they said, “Gee, now you’re really sorry you didn’t make The Grackle aren’t you?” They meant it as a joke. [laughs]
[laughs] I think you made the right choice, actually.
[laughs]
Well that’s interesting and I apologize, I did not mean to perpetuate –
Oh no need to apologize man, I’m happy to answer any of those questions, I just want to set them straight.
Right, right. Now last question about projects. This is from Rodrigo from The Playlist who’s asking these questions about Old St. Louis with Vince Vaughn.
Let’s talk about that. That was a really good project that I re-wrote for Vince kind of in the vein of Paper Moon. I thought I’d be making that this autumn but it’s really not up to me a lot of times. In that case a lot of it was up to Vince who decided to make the Ron Howard project instead, because we were supposed to making that, and he went off to make The Dilemma with Kevin James and that’s what happened with that. So, you know –
Yeah, sometimes things just don’t work out or don’t happen, I understand.
Well there’s still talk about making that project and we may still make it when the timing’s right. That happens all the time in this business.
I gotta ask you about Uncharted. Can you talk about your relationship with the property to begin with, had you played the games before you were approached with the project in the first place and just talk a little about that because it’s certainly one of my favorite games on the Playstation.
Ah, big game player!
I wouldn’t describe it that way, but sure.
My good friend Chuck Roven who produced the Batman movies like The Dark Knight, and produced Three Kings with me, came to me with Avi Arad who used to run Marvel Comics and who does the Spider-Man movies, with Amy Pascal, the head of Sony, and said, “What do you think? Would you like to try to create a really smart, interesting, intense franchise based on this game?” And I said yeah, let me check it out.
My son plays most of the games in our house, and I will play them with him but I’m not hardcore. I’m not going to present myself as hardcore. But I played the game a bunch of times and I also read as much as I could about the game and I met the game’s creator, Amy Hennig, who’s really cool. I started to brew together what I thought could be a really cool idea that I’d never seen in a film before…Really intense action and really intense family dynamics on a global stage. To grow a game into a movie is an interesting proposition because a game is a very different experience than a movie. You guys are playing the game, and it’s about playing the game. It’s not about a narrative embracing you emotionally. You know what I’m saying? So, I want to create a world that is worthy of a really great film that people want to watch and rewatch, so that’s what I’m working on right now.
My last question is, I don’t know if you’ve read on the interwebs but a lot of people have made a number of suggestions as to how one should go about making an Uncharted game. I wonder if you have any reaction to that, or do you even know what I’m talking about to begin with?
Well I’ve had people come up to me after screenings and pitch people they think should play the roles and I think we’ve seen that before with movies like Interview with the Vampire where there was a lot of fans of Anne Rice’s book and there were a lot of strong opinions about how to make it.
As far as I’m concerned, I’m very respectful as far as the core content and sprit of the game, but beyond that it’s my job as a filmmaker to make what I think is going to be an amazing movie. People have to trust that and let that go, I think. There’s not a bunch of movies you can point to that are made from games that are amazing movies, that stand up to time as a franchise or as [individual films]. I personally think it’s really cool when you see that someone like Darren Aronofsky is going to make an X-Men movie or to get someone such as myself to make this picture. You can be guaranteed that it’s going to be real, it’s going to be raw, it’s going to be intense, it’s going to be original, and it’s going to be propulsive. And those are all the things that I want when I go to watch a movie like that.
Well David O. Russell it’s been an honor to speak with you today. Thanks so much for joining us on the Slashfilmcast and thank you for taking time to answer our questions and those of our readers and listeners.
Thank you David for having me. Rock on and I’ll be talking to you soon I hope.
Good luck at the Oscars this year.
Thank you. We’ll need it!
BenchCraft, LLC announced that it can debut its Concert Series, a fresh line of recliners with an integrated sound method, at Great Point Marketplace on October 17-22, 2009. Concert Series recliners attribute two built-in stereo speakers including a subwoofer created particularly to build a full assortment of sound. It has tactile motors which may either vibrate along with the sound or be put into use independently as a massage process, and separate controls that permit for individual adjustments for being designed to the volume, bass/treble, and therefore the tactile/massage attribute. The program, that will possess a starting price position of $699, will also encompass a mini audio jack so end users can connect to their several audio resources (i.e. iPods, MP3 players, cell phones, and so forth.). To that finish, Sinning mentioned that Berkline will even be introducing in choose movement
bench craft company reviews
furniture its new eCoupled know-how option--a wireless charging station for electronic devices which include cell phones, MP3 players, and laptops. Designed by Fulton Innovation, it eliminates the desire for electrical power cords by producing an electromagnetic conduit combined with an intelligent command method that frequently monitors energy movement so different devices from distinctive manufactures can charge simultaneously. eCoupled engineering is also safe for digital devices as a result of it allows for only the amount of energy
bench craft company reviews
desired to maintain a gadget at peak power ranges, so there exists no threat of overcharging. When the number of devices compatible with this know-how is constrained, Berkline expects that extra and much more makes will move toward incorporating the ability to connect for the eCoupled operate
The Bench Craft Company delivers no excuses for your complicated effort and perseverance that they commit themselves to in an effort to maintain themselves as the leader in nationwide onsite golf program home
bench craft company reviews
advertising. No excuses for delivering their clientele along with the most extensive protection for their bench craft company reviews marketing dollar whether or not it be locally or nationwide. No excuses for providing golf program properties by far the most seamless plan for creating more earnings during the most non-intrusive method, even though enhancing the outstanding from the services along with the expertise of their golfers on their residence. Bench Craft is committed to becoming the best in addition to the largest at what they do, promoting on golf course bench craft company reviews venues.
In an age where no one
bench craft company reviews
would like to get responsibility for anything, Bench Craft makes itself totally responsible for your achievement of their advertising clientele, which can be why their clients and effectively as Bench Craft constantly practical knowledge nutritious growth charges and revenue margins. A provider cannot be any longer
bench craft company reviews
prosperous than their buyer, so it's mission of Bench Craft for making specific that every single client receives the most suitable potential venue for presenting their clients
bench craft company reviews
merchandise and services, regardless of whether it be locally or nationally. This dedication to outstanding is what sets Bench Craft apart from its competitors, and dollar for dollar helps make its marketing goods several of the most treasured within the trade.
The golf programs bench craft company reviews that Bench Craft Company operates in concert with, acquire companies and merchandise at no charge. Bench Craft Company gross sales team right funds this program for every golf course by getting sponsors for each solution. Community vendors and gamers inside the neighborhood get sponsorship priority and golf course management functions closely with Bench Craft to acknowledge possible sponsors. Bench Craft’s extremely successful
bench craft company reviews
process supplies golf courses a no cost of charge different that also eliminates fees due to this fact of design changes, course modifications, theft and vandalism.
As getting a definite added advantage, every single program is guarded underneath a $3,000,000 liability policy. The organization can accommodate almost every golf course. In addition, Bench Craft Company operates jointly with all branches of the Armed Forces, and also state, county and city golf courses. This selection of golf courses offers Bench Craft’s consumers with all the most in depth coverage of golf program properties within the United states.
The ahead
bench craft company reviews
thinking Visionaries at Bench Craft Company designed a technique that garners the awareness and participation of not just its personal income employees, however the sponsors, golf program management as well as the membership and patrons. There is only one Bench Craft Company, don’t drop for rip off plots by imposters working a scam.
bench craft company reviews
No comments:
Post a Comment